Which of these sounds like you?

The work underneath is the same. What changes is how you buy it, who I answer to, and how much of the technical picture I own. Each page covers the situations I get called for, how engagements are structured, and how pricing works.

Running Umbraco 13? Support ends in 2026.

When support ends, security patches stop. A planned upgrade to Umbraco 17 LTS costs less — and hurts less — than an emergency one. See what your timeline should look like.

Where the difference shows

The quality layer most builds skip: accessibility to WCAG 2.2 AA, Core Web Vitals in the green, semantic markup that survives an audit, and technical SEO built in rather than bolted on afterwards. I deliver the whole stack — Umbraco, .NET, integrations — but this is the part you can see, measure and get sued over.

Two things most developers hand off

I do not. Both decide whether the build earns anything, and both are technical problems before they are marketing ones.

KindbergCo Umbraco Platform Small

The platform underneath the work

Rather than rebuild the same foundation on every project, I maintain one: an Umbraco platform with SEO, accessibility and performance defaults already in place, built against WCAG 2.2 AA principles. My own client work runs on it, and it is licensed separately for agencies and developers who want the same starting point.

See what the platform includes

Not sure which of these you need?

Describe what is actually happening — the deadline you are going to miss, the site nobody can safely touch, the developer you cannot hire in time — and I will tell you whether it is something I should take on. If it is not, I usually know who should.